Some years ago, walking through a neighborhood of Lima, I saw some
curious and disturbing street-signs. Placed over various walls and posts,
sometimes isolated, other times in small or large groups, a series of
white and colored papers, proposed a photocopied text of two lines,
concise and direct: problems needed. Below the line, a local telephone
number was posted. Intrigued and after consulting some neighbors, I
realized that far from being an existential proclamation or a collective
performance, those unadorned notes where there to promote plumbing and
electrical repair services.
In a sociopolitical context like the one experienced in Latin American;
conflicted, wasted and fatigued, the presence of a street wall covered
with these precarious multicolored flyers "soliciting problems",
clearly reveals to the contradiction that signifies making art here
and now. Just like the urban advertisement - the street-sign - the more
illustrative Latin American artists have known how to operate historically
from a platform of which austerity, the media economy, clarity of planning,
a sense of pertinence that is profoundly affective, a will of "reparation"
and a very special sense of humor, constitute their distinctive seal.
Nevertheless, in the specific case of the Chile of today, it has been
possible to avoid certain fissures that are problematic and that replant
the singular relation of artist-environment that is so characteristic
of our continent. During the last fourteen years, the mechanistic complexities
of art production within the post-Pinochet scenario, have resulted in
a sequence of actions and reactions that can be considered almost incoherent.
The confusing dynamic implanted by the process of adjustment which was
baptized as "transition", began to transform during the beginning
of the 90s, profoundly affecting a new generation of artists.
Factors such as the gradual emergence of a market for contemporary folk
art; the opening of dozens of art schools throughout the country; the
growing liberty of access to the public and private spaces of exhibition;
the circulation of local artists in the international panorama; the
strong investment of transnationals in the affair of artistic diffusion;
and then taking all these into account and confronting it with a ultraconservative
cultural tone and the neo-liberal economy of the social-democratic government
in power, gives birth to the group of creators gathered here in Load
(un-load).
Since then, the format of the "social chronic" which was
so popular in the literature, theatre, music and the Chilean visual
arts, were substituted during the last several decades by different
forms of documentation (distant, cold and erudite on one side; light,
playful, comical on the other), because of an individualistic aesthetic,
"irresponsible" in the most orthodox and solemn sense of the
sadly celethe term. In the audiovisual camp, the videos "Carlos
Altamirano, Artista Chileno" by Carlos Altamirano or "Las
Cantactrices" by Carlos Leppe, or the seminal experiences in film
like " El Chacal de Nahueltoro" by Miguel Littin (1969) and
"Identicamente Igual, El Charles Bronson Chileno" by Carlos
Flores (1978-84), were giving way in the decade of the 90s to
productions, perhaps too attentive to what was happening in the international
industries of cinema and music video (Gustavo Graef-Mariano, Andres
Wood, Cristian Galaz, German Bobe, etc). And although it is certainly
possible to continue to find many sensible and valuable works (like
"Aqui Se Construye" by Ignacio Aguero, 2000), the audiovisual
vanguard in Chile manifests in general a condition that has masked the
outcome, and that result is directly proportional to the availability
of commercial resources and technicians that are apparently growing
in number.
Juan Cespedes, Felix Lazo, Cristobal Lehyt, Mario Navarro, Mariano
Maturana, Macarena Rivas, Francisco Valdes and Joe Villblanca, the artist
gathered in the present selection, have know how to sustain a consistent
position, and are at the same time agile with respect to the limitations
of their context and their ideological instabilities. With the objective
of enriching their codes, they have certainly jumped from one medium
to the next. They have maintained alert in the face of contemporary
urban social problems, they have negotiated with serenity their historical
and public inscription, but over all, they have worked directly and
subtlety from their own and dissimilar sensibilities.
In a territory like the Chilean one, sadly celebrated by its frequent
and devastating earthquakes , we could point out that its proponents
have been articulating according to the indications of the most sophisticated
anti-seismic devices; that is to say, absorbing, resisting and recycling
external energies, employing for it flexibility over force. And although
practically all of them have received an education in visual arts, graphics
and painting and not all of them actually reside in Chile, their incursion
into the audiovisual has constituted an interesting contribution for
the younger generations of local artists. In this sense, it is worth
mentioning "Gran Santiago" by Joe Villblanca (1997) as one
of the most representative works of this attitude and perhaps of the
most radical gestures realized in video during the decade of the 90s
in Chile. With an extremely low-tech recording of a brief, gentle, candid,
erratic and somewhat delirious telephonic eruption of the artist during
a live transmission of a television talk show, he promoted his own work,
in hope of gathering enough attention from an otherwise absent and silent,
Chilean audience.
Guadalajara, June 2002